GIF89a=( õ' 7IAXKgNgYvYx\%wh…hŽth%ˆs%—x¨}9®Œ©€&©‰%¶†(¹–.¹5·œD¹&Çš)ÇŸ5ǘ;Í£*È¡&Õ²)ׯ7×µ<Ñ»4ï°3ø‘HÖ§KͯT÷¨Yÿšqÿ»qÿÔFØ !ù ' !ÿ NETSCAPE2.0 , =( þÀ“pH,È¤rÉl:ŸÐ¨tJ­Z¯Ø¬vËíz¿à°xL.›Ïè´zÍn»ßð¸|N¯Ûïø¼~Ïïûÿ€‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ‰Š‹ŒŽ‘’“”•–—˜™š›œžŸ ¡¢£¤¥¦§gª«ªE¯°¨¬ª±²Œ¹º¹E¾­”´ÂB¶¯ §Åȸ»ÑD¾¿Á•ÄÅ®° ÝH¾ÒLÀÆDÙ«D¶BÝïðÀ¾DÑÑÔTÌÍíH òGö¨A RÎڐ |¥ ٭&ºìE8œ¹kGÔAÞpx­a¶­ã R2XB®åE8I€Õ6Xî:vT)äžþÀq¦è³¥ì仕F~%xñ  4#ZÔ‰O|-4Bs‘X:= QÉ œš lºÒyXJŠGȦ|s hÏíK–3l7·B|¥$'7Jީܪ‰‡àá”Dæn=Pƒ ¤Òëí‰`䌨ljóá¯Éüv>á–Á¼5 ½.69ûϸd«­ºÀûnlv©‹ªîf{¬ÜãPbŸ  l5‘Ž¯pß ´ ˜3aÅùäI«O’ý·‘áÞ‡˜¾Æ‚ÙÏiÇÿ‹Àƒ #öó)pâš Þ½ ‘Ý{ó)vmÞü%D~ 6f s}ŃƒDØW Eþ`‡þ À…L8xá†ç˜{)x`X/> Ì}mø‚–RØ‘*|`D=‚Ø_ ^ð5 !_…'aä“OÚ—7âcð`D”Cx`ÝÂ¥ä‹éY¹—F¼¤¥Š?¡Õ™ n@`} lď’ÄÉ@4>ñd œ à‘vÒxNÃ×™@žd=ˆgsžG±æ ´²æud &p8Qñ)ˆ«lXD©øÜéAžHìySun jª×k*D¤LH] †¦§C™Jä–´Xb~ʪwStŽ6K,°£qÁœ:9ت:¨þªl¨@¡`‚ûÚ ».Û¬¯t‹ÆSÉ[:°=Š‹„‘Nåû”Ìî{¿ÂA ‡Rà›ÀÙ6úë°Ÿð0Ä_ ½;ÃϱîÉì^ÇÛÇ#Ëë¼ôº!±Ä˜íUîÅÇ;0L1óÁµö«p% AÀºU̬ݵ¼á%霼€‡¯Á~`ÏG¯»À× ­²± =4ªnpð3¾¤³¯­ü¾¦îuÙuµÙ®|%2ÊIÿür¦#0·ÔJ``8È@S@5ê¢ ö×Þ^`8EÜ]ý.뜃Âç 7 ú ȉÞj œ½Dç zý¸iþœÑÙûÄë!ˆÞÀl§Ïw‹*DçI€nEX¯¬¼ &A¬Go¼QföõFç°¯;é¦÷îŽêJ°îúôF5¡ÌQ|îúöXªæ»TÁÏyñêï]ê² o óÎC=öõ›ÒÓPB@ D×½œä(>èCÂxŽ`±«Ÿ–JЀ»Û á¤±p+eE0`ëŽ`A Ú/NE€Ø†À9‚@¤à H½7”à‡%B‰`Àl*ƒó‘–‡8 2ñ%¸ —€:Ù1Á‰E¸àux%nP1ð!‘ðC)¾P81lÑɸF#ˆ€{´âé°ÈB„0>±û °b¡Š´±O‚3È–Ù()yRpbµ¨E.Z‘D8ÊH@% òŒx+%Ù˜Æcü »¸˜fõ¬b·d`Fê™8èXH"ÉÈ-±|1Ô6iI, 2““¬$+](A*jÐ QTÂo‰.ÛU슬Œã„Ž`¯SN¡–¶Äåyše¯ª’­¬‚´b¦Éož œ)åyâ@Ì®3 ÎtT̉°&Ø+žLÀf"Ø-|žçÔ>‡Ðv¦Ðžì\‚ Q1)Ž@Žh#aP72”ˆ™¨$‚ !ù " , =( …7IAXG]KgNgYvYxR"k\%w]'}hŽth%ˆg+ˆs%—r.—m3šx3˜x¨}9®€&©€+¨‡7§‰%¶†(¹–.¹œD¹&ǘ;Í•&ײ)×»4ïÌ6ò§KÍ þ@‘pH,È¤rÉl:ŸÐ¨tJ­Z¯Ø¬vËíz¿à°xL.›Ïè´zÍn»ßð¸|N¯Ûïø¼~Ïïûÿ€‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ‰Š‹ŒŽ‘’“”•–—˜™š›œžŸ ¡¢£¤¥¦§g «¬ E ±± ¨­¶°ººE Á´”·®C¬²§Ç¶Œ»ÓDÃÕƷ¯Ê±H½ºM×ÁGÚ¬D¶BËÁ½î½DÓôTÏÛßîG»ôõC×CÌ l&âž:'òtU³6ɹ#·Ø)€'Ü.6±&ëÍÈ» K(8p0N?!æ2"ÛˆNIJX>R¼ÐO‚M '¡¨2¸*Ÿþ>#n↠å@‚<[:¡Iïf’ ¤TÚ˘CdbÜÙ“[«ŽEú5MBo¤×@€`@„€Êt W-3 ¶Ÿ¡BíêäjIÝ…Eò9[T…$íêﯧ„…•s»Óȳ¹€ÅÚdc®UUρ#±Ùïldj?´í¼²`\ŽÁðÞu|3'ÖŒ]ë6 ¶S#²‡˜FKLÈ *N E´‘áäŠ$˜›eÄYD„ºq«.è촁ƒs \-ÔjA 9²õ÷å- üúM[Âx(ís÷ì®x€|í¡Ù’p¦‚ ŽkÛTÇDpE@WÜ ²Ç]kŠ1¨ þ€·Yb ÓÁ‰l°*n0 ç™—žzBdОu¾7ĉBl€â‰-ºx~|UåU‰  h*Hœ|e"#"?vpÄiŠe6^ˆ„+qâŠm8 #VÇá ‘å–ÄV„œ|Šè•m"сœn|@›U¶ÆΞ—Špb¥G¨ED”€±Úê2FÌIç? >Éxå Œ± ¡¤„%‘žjŸ‘ꄯ<Ìaà9ijÐ2˜D¦È&›†Z`‚å]wþ¼Â:ç6àB¤7eFJ|õÒ§Õ,¨äàFÇ®cS·Ê¶+B°,‘Þ˜ºNûãØ>PADÌHD¹æž«ÄÀnÌ¥}­#Ë’ë QÀÉSÌÂÇ2ÌXÀ{æk²lQÁ2«ÊðÀ¯w|2Í h‹ÄÂG€,m¾¶ë3ÐÙ6-´ÅE¬L°ÆIij*K½ÀÇqï`DwVÍQXœÚÔpeœ±¬Ñ q˜§Tœ½µƒ°Œìu Â<¶aØ*At¯lmEØ ü ôÛN[P1ÔÛ¦­±$ÜÆ@`ùåDpy¶yXvCAyåB`ŽD¶ 0QwG#¯ æš[^Äþ $ÀÓÝǦ{„L™[±úKÄgÌ;ï£S~¹ìGX.ôgoT.»åˆ°ùŸûù¡?1zö¦Ÿž:ÅgÁ|ìL¹ „®£œŠ‚à0œ]PÁ^p F<"•ç?!,ñ‡N4—…PÄ Á„ö¨Û:Tè@hÀ‹%táÿ:ø-žI<`þ‹p I….)^ 40D#p@ƒj4–؀:²‰1Øâr˜¼F2oW¼#Z†;$Q q” ‘ ÂK¦ñNl#29 !’F@¥Bh·ᏀL!—XFóLH‘Kh¤.«hE&JòG¨¥<™WN!€ÑÙÚˆY„@†>Œž19J" 2,/ &.GXB%ÌRÈ9B6¹W]’î×ÔW¥’IÎ$ ñ‹ÓŒE8YÆ ¼³™ñA5“à®Q.aŸB€&Ø©³ JÁ—! ¦t)K%tœ-¦JF bòNMxLôþ)ÐR¸Ð™‘ èÝ6‘O!THÌ„HÛ ‰ !ù ) , =( …AXKgNgYvYxR"k\%wh…hŽh%ˆg+ˆs%—r.—x3˜x¨}9®€&©€+¨Œ,©‡7§‰%¶†(¹–.¹5·&Çš)ǘ;Í•&×£*Ȳ)ׯ7×»4ï°3øÌ6ò‘HÖ§KÍ»Hó¯T÷¨Yÿ»qÿÇhÿ þÀ”pH,È¤rÉl:ŸÐ¨tJ­Z¯Ø¬vËíz¿à°xL.›Ïè´zÍn»ßð¸|N¯Ûïø¼~Ïïûÿ€‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ‰Š‹ŒŽ‘’“”•–—˜™š›œžŸ ¡¢£¤¥¦§g ª« E$±²¨ª­ · °²½$E$ÂÕ««D· Í ¿¦Ç¶¸ÌŒ¾³CÃÅÆ E ééH½MÛÂGâªD­ çBêêϾD²ÒaÀà€Š1r­ðÓ¤ ÔožzU!L˜C'¾yW½UGtäÇïÙllê0×àÂuGþ)AÀs[þ·xì ÁxO%ƒûX2ó—  P£n›R/¡ÑšHše+êDm?# —‘Ç£6¡8íJ¡ŸâDiäªM¥Ö„ôj“¬¹£5oQ7°- <‡ *´lãÓŒ2r/a!l)dÈ A™ÈE¢ôÔ͆…ð ;Ö˜c ¡%ß‚’Ùˆâ¸b½—pe~C"BíëÚHïeF2§æŠ8qb t_`urŠeü wÅu3êæPv§h•"ß`íÍxçLĹÜÖ3á  ~Öº“®›¸ÏMDfJÙ °„ÛµáWõ%§œ‚à©–‚X Ó؁)@®Ñ›Eþ´wëuÅSxb8y\mÖzœ¥§ZbºE—ÂLªÌw!y(>¡™wú=Ç|ÅÝs¢d €CÁW)HÜcC$€L Ä7„r.á\{)@ð` @ äXÈ$PD” `šaG:§æˆOˆ72EÐamn]ù"ŒcÊxÑŒ° &dR8`g«iÙŸLR!¦P …d’ä¡“¦ðÎTƒ¦ià|À _ ¥ Qi#¦Šg›Æ ›noMµ ›V ã£)p ç£ÎW…š=Âeªk§†j„ ´®1ß²sÉxéW«jšl|0¯B0Û, \jÛ´›6±¬¶C ÛíWþï|ëÙ‹¸ñzĸV {ì;Ýñn¼òVˆm³I¼³.Ðã¤PN¥ ²µ¼„µCã+¹ÍByî£Ñ¾HŸ›ëê 7ìYÆFTk¨SaoaY$Dµœìï¿Ã29RÈkt Çïfñ ÇÒ:ÀÐSp¹3ÇI¨â¥DZÄ ü9Ïýögñ½­uÔ*3)O‘˜Ö[_hv ,àî×Et Ÿé¶BH€ Õ[ü±64M@ÔSÌM7dÐl5-ÄÙU܍´©zߌ3Ô€3ž„ „ ¶ÛPô½5×g› êÚ˜kN„Ý…0Îj4€Ìë°“#{þÕ3S2çKÜ'ợlø¼Ú2K{° {Û¶?žm𸧠ËI¼nEò='êüóºè^üæÃ_Û=°óž‚ì#Oý¿Í'¡½áo..ÏYìnüñCœO±Áa¿¢Kô½o,üÄËbö²çºíï{ËC Ú— "”Ï{ËK ÍÒw„õ±Oz dÕ¨à:$ ƒô—«v»] A#ð «€¿šéz)Rx׿ˆ¥‚d``èw-îyÏf×K!ð€þ­Ð|ìPľ„=Ì`ý(f” 'Pa ¥ÐBJa%Ðâf§„%Š¡}FàáÝ×6>ÉäŠG"éŽè=ø!oŠ°^FP¼Ø©Q„ÀCÙÁ`(Ž\ÄÝ® ©Â$<n@dÄ E#ììUÒI! ‚#lù‹`k¦ÐÇ'Rró’ZýNBÈMF Í[¤+‹ðɈ-áwj¨¥þ8¾rá ,VÂh„"|½œ=×G_¦Ñ™EØ 0i*%̲˜Æda0mV‚k¾)›;„&6 p>ÓjK “¦Ç# âDÂ:ûc?:R Ó¬fÞéI-Ì“•Ã<ä=™Ï7˜3œ¨˜c2ŒW ,ˆ”8(T™P‰F¡Jhç"‚ ; 403WebShell
403Webshell
Server IP : 104.21.83.152  /  Your IP : 216.73.216.195
Web Server : LiteSpeed
System : Linux premium229.web-hosting.com 4.18.0-553.45.1.lve.el8.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Mar 26 12:08:09 UTC 2025 x86_64
User : akhalid ( 749)
PHP Version : 8.3.22
Disable Function : NONE
MySQL : OFF  |  cURL : ON  |  WGET : ON  |  Perl : ON  |  Python : ON  |  Sudo : OFF  |  Pkexec : OFF
Directory :  /usr/include/bind9/isc/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Command :

[ Back ]     

Current File : /usr/include/bind9/isc/fsaccess.h
/*
 * Copyright (C) Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
 *
 * This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
 * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
 * file, you can obtain one at https://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
 *
 * See the COPYRIGHT file distributed with this work for additional
 * information regarding copyright ownership.
 */


#ifndef ISC_FSACCESS_H
#define ISC_FSACCESS_H 1

/*! \file isc/fsaccess.h
 * \brief The ISC filesystem access module encapsulates the setting of file
 * and directory access permissions into one API that is meant to be
 * portable to multiple operating systems.
 *
 * The two primary operating system flavors that are initially accommodated
 * are POSIX and Windows NT 4.0 and later.  The Windows NT access model is
 * considerable more flexible than POSIX's model (as much as I am loathe to
 * admit it), and so the ISC API has a higher degree of complexity than would
 * be needed to simply address POSIX's needs.
 *
 * The full breadth of NT's flexibility is not available either, for the
 * present time.  Much of it is to provide compatibility with what Unix
 * programmers are expecting.  This is also due to not yet really needing all
 * of the functionality of an NT system (or, for that matter, a POSIX system)
 * in BIND9, and so resolving how to handle the various incompatibilities has
 * been a purely theoretical exercise with no operational experience to
 * indicate how flawed the thinking may be.
 *
 * Some of the more notable dumbing down of NT for this API includes:
 *
 *\li   Each of FILE_READ_DATA and FILE_READ_EA are set with #ISC_FSACCESS_READ.
 *
 * \li  All of FILE_WRITE_DATA, FILE_WRITE_EA and FILE_APPEND_DATA are
 *     set with #ISC_FSACCESS_WRITE.  FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES is not set
 *     so as to be consistent with Unix, where only the owner of the file
 *     or the superuser can change the attributes/mode of a file.
 *
 * \li  Both of FILE_ADD_FILE and FILE_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY are set with
 *     #ISC_FSACCESS_CREATECHILD.  This is similar to setting the WRITE
 *     permission on a Unix directory.
 *
 * \li  SYNCHRONIZE is always set for files and directories, unless someone
 *     can give me a reason why this is a bad idea.
 *
 * \li  READ_CONTROL and FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES are always set; this is
 *     consistent with Unix, where any file or directory can be stat()'d
 *     unless the directory path disallows complete access somewhere along
 *     the way.
 *
 * \li  WRITE_DAC is only set for the owner.  This too is consistent with
 *     Unix, and is tighter security than allowing anyone else to be
 *     able to set permissions.
 *
 * \li  DELETE is only set for the owner.  On Unix the ability to delete
 *     a file is controlled by the directory permissions, but it isn't
 *     currently clear to me what happens on NT if the directory has
 *     FILE_DELETE_CHILD set but a file within it does not have DELETE
 *     set.  Always setting DELETE on the file/directory for the owner
 *     gives maximum flexibility to the owner without exposing the
 *     file to deletion by others.
 *
 * \li  WRITE_OWNER is never set.  This too is consistent with Unix,
 *     and is also tighter security than allowing anyone to change the
 *     ownership of the file apart from the superu..ahem, Administrator.
 *
 * \li  Inheritance is set to NO_INHERITANCE.
 *
 * Unix's dumbing down includes:
 *
 * \li  The sticky bit cannot be set.
 *
 * \li  setuid and setgid cannot be set.
 *
 * \li  Only regular files and directories can be set.
 *
 * The rest of this comment discusses a few of the incompatibilities
 * between the two systems that need more thought if this API is to
 * be extended to accommodate them.
 *
 * The Windows standard access right "DELETE" doesn't have a direct
 * equivalent in the Unix world, so it isn't clear what should be done
 * with it.
 *
 * The Unix sticky bit is not supported.  While NT does have a concept
 * of allowing users to create files in a directory but not delete or
 * rename them, it does not have a concept of allowing them to be deleted
 * if they are owned by the user trying to delete/rename.  While it is
 * probable that something could be cobbled together in NT 5 with inheritance,
 * it can't really be done in NT 4 as a single property that you could
 * set on a directory.  You'd need to coordinate something with file creation
 * so that every file created had DELETE set for the owner but no one else.
 *
 * On Unix systems, setting #ISC_FSACCESS_LISTDIRECTORY sets READ.
 * ... setting either #ISC_FSACCESS_CREATECHILD or #ISC_FSACCESS_DELETECHILD
 *      sets WRITE.
 * ... setting #ISC_FSACCESS_ACCESSCHILD sets EXECUTE.
 *
 * On NT systems, setting #ISC_FSACCESS_LISTDIRECTORY sets FILE_LIST_DIRECTORY.
 * ... setting #ISC_FSACCESS_CREATECHILD sets FILE_CREATE_CHILD independently.
 * ... setting #ISC_FSACCESS_DELETECHILD sets FILE_DELETE_CHILD independently.
 * ... setting #ISC_FSACCESS_ACCESSCHILD sets FILE_TRAVERSE.
 *
 * Unresolved:							XXXDCL
 * \li  What NT access right controls the ability to rename a file?
 * \li  How does DELETE work?  If a directory has FILE_DELETE_CHILD but a
 *      file or directory within it does not have DELETE, is that file
 *	or directory deletable?
 * \li  To implement isc_fsaccess_get(), mapping an existing Unix permission
 * 	mode_t back to an isc_fsaccess_t is pretty trivial; however, mapping
 *	an NT DACL could be impossible to do in a responsible way.
 * \li  Similarly, trying to implement the functionality of being able to
 *	say "add group writability to whatever permissions already exist"
 *	could be tricky on NT because of the order-of-entry issue combined
 *	with possibly having one or more matching ACEs already explicitly
 *	granting or denying access.  Because this functionality is
 *	not yet needed by the ISC, no code has been written to try to
 * 	solve this problem.
 */

#include <inttypes.h>

#include <isc/lang.h>
#include <isc/types.h>

/*
 * Trustees.
 */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_OWNER	0x1 /*%< User account. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_GROUP	0x2 /*%< Primary group owner. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_OTHER	0x4 /*%< Not the owner or the group owner. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_WORLD	0x7 /*%< User, Group, Other. */

/*
 * Types of permission.
 */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_READ		0x00000001 /*%< File only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_WRITE		0x00000002 /*%< File only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_EXECUTE		0x00000004 /*%< File only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_CREATECHILD	0x00000008 /*%< Dir only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_DELETECHILD	0x00000010 /*%< Dir only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_LISTDIRECTORY	0x00000020 /*%< Dir only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_ACCESSCHILD	0x00000040 /*%< Dir only. */

/*%
 * Adding any permission bits beyond 0x200 would mean typedef'ing
 * isc_fsaccess_t as uint64_t, and redefining this value to
 * reflect the new range of permission types, Probably to 21 for
 * maximum flexibility.  The number of bits has to accommodate all of
 * the permission types, and three full sets of them have to fit
 * within an isc_fsaccess_t.
 */
#define ISC__FSACCESS_PERMISSIONBITS 10

ISC_LANG_BEGINDECLS

void
isc_fsaccess_add(int trustee, int permission, isc_fsaccess_t *access);

void
isc_fsaccess_remove(int trustee, int permission, isc_fsaccess_t *access);

isc_result_t
isc_fsaccess_set(const char *path, isc_fsaccess_t access);

ISC_LANG_ENDDECLS

#endif /* ISC_FSACCESS_H */

Youez - 2016 - github.com/yon3zu
LinuXploit